Thursday, June 12, 2008

As I was tucking into my lunch yesterday I was taken by just how tasty the chickpeas were!  Munching on the little gems got me thinking about their nutritional value and their potential benefits to our health.

These ‘legumes’ go by many names: Chickpea, Ceci Bean, Indian Pea, Egyptian Pea, Garbanzo Bean and Gram and are mainly grown in the Mediterranean, Indian subcontinent and western Asia where they form a major part of the diet.  I was interested to learn that they are thought to be one of the earliest vegetables cultivated by humans.

Chickpeas are a useful source of fibre, zinc, folate and protein.  Being ever curious I hit the medical journals to see if there were any chickpea-specific studies.  I was in luck, one small study(1) has been published this month.  The authors wanted to assess the impact that incorporating chickpeas into the diet of 45 adults would have on their health.  The individuals taking part consumed about 728g of canned, drained chickpeas per week, (if you break this down to 100g per day it doesn’t sound like such a huge amount!), for 12 weeks.  After this time the participants went back to eating their normal diet for 4 weeks. 

In the ‘chickpea phase’ they ate around 7g more fibre a day (this is significant, as the UK population generally do not consume enough fibre) than they did during the ‘normal phase’.  They also had a lower saturated fat: polyunsaturated fat ratio.  Interestingly during the ‘chickpea phase the participants had significantly lowered total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, thought to be the ‘bad guy’ cholesterol linked to heart disease, and also had better markers for blood sugar control (they showed lower fasting insulin levels and lower insulin resistance).  Analysis by the scientists revealed that it was the dietary fibre content of the chickpeas that was having the greatest effect on these health indicators.  The authors comment that their results warrant larger studies in groups who have problems with high cholesterol levels and/or poor blood sugar control (such as individuals with type II diabetes or insulin-resistance syndrome).

Another small study that was published in 2006(2) showed similar benefits of including chickpeas in the diet.  The study compared the effects of a chickpea-supplemented diet to those of a wheat-supplemented diet on cholesterol levels.  The 47 participants ate a chickpea-supplemented diet for at least 5 weeks and then a wheat-supplemented diet for at least 5 weeks.  The serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels were significantly lower after the chickpea-supplemented diet as compared with the wheat-supplemented diet.

A diet that is high in fibre has been linked to numerous health benefits in most areas of the body from the: heart, where it seems to have positive effects on blood pressure and risk of heart disease; digestive system where it seems to be useful to sufferers of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), constipation and diverticulitis and the immune system where there seems to be a link with reduced risk of cancer.  A high fibre diet also appears to be very useful in blood sugar control and also appetite control as it gives us the feeling of fullness and helps to control satiety.  The recommended daily intake for fibre in the UK is currently set at 18g/d, however for optimal health many experts regard at least 25g per day as necessary.  In the UK our average intake is low at only 12g/d.

Chickpeas can be easily incorporated into salads, curries, dips (e.g. hummus), veggie-burgers, casseroles and stews....the list is endless.  If you are using canned chickpeas (which are very convenient and still nutritious) go for those in water with no added salt or sugar.

(1)Pittaway JK, Robertson IK, Ball MJ.  2008.  Chickpeas may influence Fatty Acid and fiber intake in an ad libitum diet, leading to small improvements in serum lipid profile and glycemic control.  J Am Diet Assoc. 108:1009-13.
(2) Pittaway JK, Ahuja KD, Cehun M, Chronopoulos A, Robertson IK, Nestel PJ, Ball MJ.  2006.  Dietary supplementation with chickpeas for at least 5 weeks results in small but significant reductions in serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterols in adult women and men.  Ann Nutr Metab.  50(6):512-8.

Written by Ani Kowal

Thursday, June 12, 2008 8:06:30 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback 
 Tuesday, June 10, 2008

On the 30th May  I wrote about the importance of Vitamin D for health and concentrated mainly on the link to cancer prevention.

Yesterday a study was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine(1) which adds to the growing body of research that links low vitamin D levels to poorer heart health.

This particular study involved a group of 18225 middle aged and older men (aged 40-75 years).  The men were free of diagnosed heart disease at the initial blood collection.  They were then followed for 10 years and in this time 454 developed heart attacks (which were either fatal or non fatal).  The study scientists then compared the blood levels of vitamin D in those men who had suffered a heart attack to a group of 900 similar men (matched for certain factors such as age and smoking status) who had not.  The results showed that men with low blood levels of vitamin D were at increased risk of heart attack compared to men with sufficient levels.  Even men with intermediate blood levels of vitamin D were at increased risk of heart attack.

The findings are significant as the scientists adjusted the results to exclude a whole host of other possible confounding factors such as family history of heart attack, weight (Body Mass Index), alcohol consumption, physical activity levels, history of diabetes, blood pressure, ethnicity, omega 3 fatty acid intake and cholesterol levels.  Even when these factors were taken into account the men with low vitamin D levels were twice as likely to experience a heart attack than those with high vitamin D levels.

The authors of the study conclude that “Low levels of 25(OHD) [vitamin D] are associated with a higher risk of myocardial infarction [heart attack] in a graded manner, even after controlling for factors known to be associated with coronary artery disease”

Previous studies have linked low vitamin D levels to atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries), congestive heart failure and high blood pressure.  As I mentioned in my previous post on vitamin D many of us in the UK may not have adequate levels of vitamin D in our blood.  A supplement of 12mcg/d (around 500iu) could be useful to those who rarely get out in the sunlight or during the autumn and winter months.

It is not entirely understood why vitamin D is so important for the health of the heart.  There are indications that vitamin D acts to reduce the production of pro-inflammatory chemicals (cytokines) which are linked to heart disease and may even increase the production of anti-inflammatory chemicals which are protective.  Vitamin D may also have an effect on certain hormones which play an important role in the regulation of blood pressure. 

(1)Giovannucci E et al.  2008.  25-Hydroxyvitamin D and risk of myocardial infarction in men: a prospective study.  Arch Intern Med.  168:1181-1187

Written by Ani Kowal

Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:15:50 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback 
 Monday, June 09, 2008

Now that it is getting warmer (I was in London this weekend and it was a real scorcher!) it is essential that we consume adequate fluids throughout the day in order to keep properly hydrated.  Dehydration occurs, technically, when the loss of water from the body equates to 1% of the body’s weight.  It is important to drink before feeling thirsty as the sensation of thirst usually occurs after the body is already more than 1% dehydrated.

Keeping hydrated is important in order for us to function at our best.  Dehydration actually impairs short-term memory and can make us feel fatigued and irritable and is linked to the occurrence of headaches.  However, what we chose to quench our thirst can have a real impact on our health and waistlines!  I would highly recommend sticking to water as a thirst preventer and quencher.

A single can of regular soft drink may contain 40-50g of sugar.  If you were to drink one can a day in addition to your daily regular food intake you could gain 5kg of weight in one year!  The International Association for the Study of Obesity recognise that energy dense drinks represent a significant contributing factor in the rise in childhood obesity.  Soft drinks represent liquid calories and last year an analysis of 88 medical studies(1) concluded that there are clear associations between soft drink intake and increased energy intake and body weight. Soft drink intake was also associated with lower intakes of important nutrients (such as calcium and vitamins) and with an increased risk of several medical problems such as diabetes.

What about ‘diet’ soft drinks?  Artificial sweeteners are not something I can get excited about and I personally do not think they have any part to play in achieving a healthy balanced diet.  With respect to weight loss and/or weight maintenance there is evidence to suggest that artificial sweeteners may actually stimulate the appetite(2,3,4) and lead to increased calorie intake.  It is thought that the sweetness without the calories does not satiate the body and hence appetite is increased and subsequent calorie intake may be greater than if a regular drink had been consumed in the first place.

Pure fruit juices and fruit smoothies are often seen as the ‘healthy’ option.  Of course, these juices are more nutritious than a sugar-filled soft drinks but they do represent added calories if drunk in addition to normal daily intakes.  They are also high in natural fruit sugar (fructose) which has been linked to obesity and diabetes.  I would suggest limiting juice consumption to one glass per day with breakfast or as part of a meal but not for use as a regular thirst quencher or hydrator.

At the end of the day plain old water wins hands down in my opinion!

(1) Vartainian LR et al.  2007.  Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Am J Public Health.  97:667-675
(2) Rogers PJ & Blundell JE.  1989.  Separating the actions of sweetness and calories: effects of saccharin and carbohydrates on hunger and food intake in human subjects.  Physiol Behav.  45:1093-1099
(3)Tordoff MG & Alleva AM.  1990.  Oral stimulation with aspartame increases hunger.  Physiol Behav.  47:555-559
(4) Lavin JH et al.  1997.  The effect of sucrose and aspartame sweetened sweetened drinks on energy intake, hunger and food choice of female moderately restrained eaters.  International Journal of Obesity.  21:37-42

Written by Ani Kowal

Monday, June 09, 2008 9:07:42 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [2] Trackback 
 Friday, June 06, 2008

In Part I I mentioned that UV light can cause damage to the skin and contribute to photo-ageing through the initiation of inflammation.  The long chain omega 3 fatty acids EPA (Eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) found in oily fish such as salmon, trout, sardines and mackerel as well as the shorter chain alpha-linolenic acid found abundantly in flax seeds acids are used by the body for the production of potent anti-inflammatory chemicals.  Including these omega 3 fatty acids in the diet may help to reduce sun induced inflammation, UVB skin sensitivity and may also help in the prevention of sunburn(1,2,3).

As mentioned in previous posts, omega 3 fatty acids are essential for optimal health for numerous reasons and many of us do not get adequate amounts from our daily diet.  If you are not a regular fish eater, or are vegetarian you may wish to consider taking a fish oil supplement to provide EPA (around 300mg per day) and DHA (around 200mg per day) or a vegetarian flaxseed oil (around 1000mg per day) supplement.  This could be useful to give the skin added natural sun protection and provide the body with a regular source of these essential fats.

Finally I would like to bring your attention to two studies(4,5).  They are of particular interest to me since they looked at cocoa consumption in relation to protection against sunburn.  Really dark chocolate (minimum 85% cocoa solids) is a passion of mine and I tend to indulge in a few squares at least a couple of times a week!  These studies have shown that consumption of flavanol (naturally occurring plant compounds) rich cocoa daily for 12 weeks reduced the risk of sunburn when skin was exposed to UV rays.  The major flavonols to be found in cocoa are called epicatechin and catechin, and it seems as though they are the components within cocoa that are important for boosting sun protection.  The ingestion of high flavanol cocoa led to increases in blood flow to the skin and layers below the skin, and to increases in skin thickness and hydration.

This is not a plug to justify regular chocolate binges (although it does help me to feel better about my dark chocolate habit)!  The cocoa used in these studies, and other studies that link cocoa to health benefits such as lowered risk of heart disease, was high flavanol cocoa and only a very small amount was used daily (around 350mg).  I am fond of drinking black cocoa but it is an acquired taste, as is the bitter high % cocoa chocolate that I so adore.  Sugary, sweet milk chocolate won’t provide the health benefits discussed (sorry to be the bearer of sad news!).  Flavonoids in general are found abundantly in fruits and vegetables, which, as mentioned in part I are important in sun protection through their provision of antioxidants.  Vegetables and fruit should form the core of a healthy diet and getting a good variety will give the body many of the nutrients that are needed for optimal health.

Obviously avoiding sun burn is exceptionally important, however, a slowly-acquired sun-tan may prevent against adverse effects of sun exposure in those who naturally tan easily.  Sun-sensitive individuals (those with fair skin and who burn easily) need to be careful as they have a higher risk for skin cancers.  Seeking shade, wearing a hat, adequate clothing and avoiding prolonged sunbathing is always advisable.  Sunscreens may also help but the ability of sunscreen to delay sunburn encourages many people to stay out in the sun for long periods of time and their skin (and health) may be negatively affected by this prolonged exposure. 

Please be sensible in the sun! 

(1) Rhodes LE et al.  1995.  Dietary fish oil reduces basal and ultraviolet B-generated PGE2 levels in skin and increases the threshold to provocation of polymorphic light eruption.  Journal of Investigative Dermatology.  105(4):532-535.
(2) Rhodes LE et al.  2003.  Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid, an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, on UVR-related cancer risk in humans. An assessment of early genotoxic markers.  Carcinogenesis.  24(5):919-925.
 (3) Takemura N et al.  2002.  Dietary, but not topical, alpha-linolenic acid suppresses UVB-induced skin injury in hairless mice when compared with linoleic acids.  Photochem Photobiol.  76(6):657-663.
(4) Heinrich U et al.  2006.  Long-term ingestion of high flavanol cocoa provides photoprotection against UV-induced erythema and improves skin condition in women.  Journal of Nutrition.  136(6):1565-1569.
(5) Neukam K et al.  2007.  Consumption of flavanol-rich cocoa acutely increases microcirculation in human skin.  Eur J Nutr.  46: 53-56

Written by Ani Kowal

Friday, June 06, 2008 7:04:56 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback 
 Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Researchers at the Institute of Food Research in Norwich, have just published a study(1) indicating that probiotics (‘good’ bacteria) may help to keep hay fever symptoms at bay.

The researchers of this small study wanted to investigate whether the ‘good bacteria’ Lactobacillus casei Shirota (found in many probiotic supplements, yoghurts and drinks) played a role in modulating the symptoms of hay fever (seasonal allergic rhinitis).  Hay fever sufferers were given a milky drink, with or without the good bacteria, each day for five months.  The scientists kept track of, and compared the changes in, the immune system of the participants by collecting blood samples before, during and after grass pollen season.  

It was found that the probiotic being tested changed the way the body's immune cells responded to grass pollen.  The hay fever sufferers that had been drinking the probiotic containing drink had lower levels of the chemicals (interleukin 5 and 6 and interferon-gamma) partly responsible for the production of hay fever symptoms in the body.  They also had higher levels of specific antibodies (immunoglobulin G and E) which are associated with playing a protective role in allergy reactions.


The authors of the study conclude that “These data show that probiotic supplementation modulates immune responses in allergic rhinitis and may have the potential to alleviate the severity of symptoms.”


This was only a small study and the authors plan to do further work to further elucidate the role that probiotic ‘good’ bacteria may play in changing the immune status of hay fever sufferers.  As I mentioned in my post dated 19th May the good/friendly bacteria in our digestive system have been linked to positively enhancing the action of our immune system through their production of a variety of substances.  This study adds to the growing body of evidence which suggests that the bacteria in our digestive systems may be very important in affecting our overall health.

(1) Ivory K et al.  2008.  Oral delivery of Lactobacillus casei Shirota modifies allergen-induced immune responses in allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 May 28. [Epub ahead of print]

Written by Ani Kowal

Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:03:43 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback 
 Monday, June 02, 2008

In my last post I wrote about the importance of vitamin D and sensible sunlight exposure.  This led me to start investigating natural ways to prevent skin damage from the sun (photo-damage) and sunburn.  The concept of photo-protection by dietary means is gaining increasing amounts of attention from the scientific community. 

Sun exposure leads to photo-ageing, with chronic sun exposure being a major contributor to ageing skin which is characterised by wrinkling, loss of elasticity, increased skin fragility and slower wound healing.  This photo-ageing probably occurs for a number of different reasons:


1. UV light can damage skin cell DNA via production of destructive ‘free-radical’ molecules .
2. UVB rays seem to induce the synthesis of enzymes which cause collagen, (and other skin tissue components), in the skin to degrade, this contributes to wrinkling, loss of elasticity and fragility.
3. UV light can also induce inflammation in the skin which contributes to photo-ageing.

Luckily there are some natural ways that can help us to protect our skin from sun damage. 

Antioxidants may help to ‘quench’ the destructive free radical molecules and therefore protect against photo-damage.  Specifically; beta-carotene, lycopene, lutein, vitamin C and vitamin E seem to be most helpful.  These plant constituents are involved in the light-protecting system in plants and may contribute to the prevention of UV damage in humans.  As nutrients they are ingested in the diet and are then distributed into the skin tissues where they provide the body with photo-protection.  

A diet rich in colourful fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds will provide plentiful amounts of these antioxidants.  Beta carotene, lutein and lycopene are all carotenoids.  Carotenoids are a family of over 700 naturally occurring yellow, red and orange pigments found in vegetables and fruits.  Good sources include carrots, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, squash, peppers, cantaloupe melons, nectarines, papaya, mango and dark green vegetables such as spinach, watercress and asparagus.  Introducing a good mix of these fruits and vegetables in the diet will help keep carotenoid levels in the body high.

Absorption of these carotenoids from foods into the body is greatly affected by fat.  Without a fat source almost no carotenoids will be absorbed.  Fat acts as a carrier for the nutrients.  Now, I am not suggesting that you drown your vegetables or salads in ‘any old lard’, however I am a firm believer in using small amounts of olive oil in dressings and cooking.  Or including some nuts, seeds or olives in salads will also be helpful in order to gain maximum absorption of these important nutrients.

Two human studies have looked at tomato consumption and blood serum lycopene levels with regards the risk of sunburn(1,2).  The study groups were given lycopene or tomato-derived products rich in lycopene (mixed with olive oil) for 10-12 weeks.  Their blood serum lycopene levels increased with supplementation and they experienced a decrease in their sensitivity toward sunburn.  Sunburn damage was up to 48% lower in the groups receiving lycopene/tomato paste compared to the control groups.

Supplements containing antioxidants such as the carotenoids, vitamin C and vitamin E may also be useful in slowing down the time of development and grade of UVB induced sun damage(3).  If you feel that you are not getting a good supply of a variety of different fruit and vegetables daily in your diet, you may wish to consider taking a supplement to boost your levels of sun-protective antioxidants, especially in the sunny months or prior to a sunny holiday. 

Check back soon for Part II where I will be looking at how nutrition can help protect the skin from the inflammatory damage that the sun can cause.

(1) Stahl W et al.  2001.  Dietary tomato paste protects against ultraviolet light–induced erythema in humans.  Journal of Nutrition.  131(5):1449-1451.
(2) Aust O et al.  2005. Supplementation with tomato-based products increases lycopene, phytofluene, and phytoene levels in human serum and protects against UV-light-induced erythema.  Int J Vitam Nutr Res.  75(1):54-60. 
(3) Greul AK et al.  2002.  Photoprotection of UV-irradiated human skin: an antioxidative combination of vitamins E and C, carotenoids, selenium and proanthocyanidins.  Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol.  15(5):307-315

Written by Ani Kowal

Monday, June 02, 2008 11:08:58 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback 
 Friday, May 30, 2008

Vitamin D appears to be receiving a lot of attention in the scientific and medical press at present with well over 20 studies due for publication in June alone and many, many more already published in 2008.  In fact, as I started to research for this post the current issue of The Proceedings of The Nutrition Society arrived through my letterbox (Volume 67 No.2) and two of the featured papers covered the importance of vitamin D (one in relation to cancer and one in relation to the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis).

Vitamin D is called the sunshine vitamin, though technically vitamin D is a hormone, as it is produced in the body when the skin is exposed to the UVB rays in sunlight.  In theory spending just 10-15 minutes in the sun everyday should supply all the vitamin D that we need.  However, many of us do not get enough sun on our skin to generate adequate amounts of vitamin D especially in the autumn and winter months.  A recent analysis(1) found that there is a global widespread insufficiency of this vital nutrient and there is evidence from the National Diet and Nutrition Surveys (NDNS) which suggests that in the UK vitamin D deficiency is a real problem (2,3,4,5).  The problem is made worse in the older generations since, as we age our bodies find it increasingly difficult to manufacture vitamin D.

This does not make for good news since vitamin D is vital for our health.  Not just the health of our bones and teeth but a for our hearts (the vitamin may protect against atherosclerosis, heart attack and high blood pressure), our digestive systems, the immune system (there is increasing evidence to show that vitamin D is important in the prevention of cancer), blood sugar control (and the prevention of type I and type II diabetes and insulin resistance), muscles, brain (deficiency is linked to depression and mood), fertility and skin health.  Quite a list!

I would like to write a bit more about the link between vitamin D and cancer.  We are constantly told by the media to avoid the sun as it increases our risk of a certain type of skin cancer called ‘malignant melanoma’.  However evidence is now mounting to suggest that insufficient sunlight exposure and low vitamin D levels actually increase the risk of several types of internal cancers such as breast, prostate, colon, bladder, kidney, lung, pancreas and ovary (to name but a few) (6,7).  Just as I was finishing this post a study was published (8) which looked at UVB exposure, vitamin D levels and breast cancer risk across 107 countries.  The authors of the study found that higher blood vitamin D levels were associated with lower rates of breast cancer and UVB exposure had a protective effect on the risk of breast cancer (these effects were independent of potential confounding factors such as fertility rate, overweight, alcohol intake, animal energy intake).  Vitamin D seems to have many cancer protective properties;  it can prevent cells from multiplying and can also specifically induce the death of cancer cells. 

It certainly seems that the sun is very important for our optimal health and wellbeing!

It is essential to be safe in the sun and avoid getting burned and baked, malignant melanoma is a particularly nasty skin cancer.  However , the risk of this type of skin cancer is relatively low in comparison to other forms of cancers and staying out of the sun completely will probably do more harm than good with regard to health and overall cancer risk.  For more interesting information about the benefits of sunlight for health please visit the Sunlight Nutrition And Health Research Centre, the information there is well presented and backed up by significant amounts of good evidence.

The UV in sunlight is believed to be our main source of vitamin D with only small amounts being found in food sources such as oily fish (mackerel, salmon and sardines)and eggs.  Recently, however, there has been mass debate about whether UV exposure in the UK is sufficient to keep vitamin D levels optimal for health.  I mentioned earlier that most of us in the UK are falling short of recommended levels.  If you rarely get out into the sun you may wish to consider a vitamin D supplement which provides around 12mcg/day (around 500iu).  Such a supplement may be particularly useful during the autumn and winter months.


(1) Hagenau T et al.  2008.  Global vitamin D levels in relation to age, gender, skin pigmentation and latitude: an ecologic meta-regression analysis.  Osteoporosis International May [E publication ahead of print]
(2) Finch S et at.  1998.  National Diet and Nutrition Survey of People aged 65 Years and Over.  London: H. M. Sationery Office.
(3) Gregory L et al.  2000.  National Diet and Nutrition Survey of People aged 4-18 years. Vol 1.  Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey.  London:  The Stationery Office
(4) Henderson L et al.  2002.  National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults Aged 19-64 years.  Vol 1: Types and Quantities of Foods Consumed.  London: The Stationery Office
(5) Hypponen E & Power C.  2007.  Hypovitaminosis D in British adults age 45y: nationwide cohort study of dietary and lifestyle predictors.  Am J Clin Nutr.  85:860-888.
(6) Grant WB.  2002.  An estimate of premature cancer mortality in the U.S. due to inadequate doses of solar ultraviolet-B radiation.  Cancer.  94:1867-1875
(7) Grant WB & Garland CF.  2006.  The association of solar ultraviolet B (UVB) with reducing risk of cancer: multifactorial ecologic analysis of geographic variation in age-adjusted cancer mortality rates.  Anticancer Research.  26:2687-2699
(8) Mohr SB et al.  2008.  Relationship between low ultraviolet B irradiance and higher breast cancer risk in 107 countries.  Breast J.  14:255-60

Written by Ani Kowal

Friday, May 30, 2008 1:15:31 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [1] Trackback 
 Tuesday, May 27, 2008

The symptoms of hay fever may well be irritating and even distressing at times.  As I said in Part I I do not suffer from the condition so this may well sound easy for me to say, but trying not to get too upset and stressed about your hay fever could be a great help.  This is important to mention because stress(1) has been linked to the production of inflammatory agents in the body and could hence further aggravate your symptoms thus starting up a vicious cycle.

As discussed previously hay fever is an inflammatory condition.  A natural agent that would be highly useful in mediating the inflammatory reactions in the body is the long chain omega 3 fatty acid, Eicosapentaenoic Acid or EPA.  As well as having a general anti-inflammatory role EPA may actually help to prevent hay fever.  A study in 2003(2) demonstrated that individuals with a high intake of dietary EPA had a 55% reduction in their incidence of hay fever compared with persons who consume low amounts of dietary EPA.

EPA is naturally found in oily fish such as mackerel, salmon, trout and sardines.  As well as aiding the production of potent anti-inflammatory chemicals in the body it is also beneficial to the health of the heart, brain, eyes, nerves, bones, digestive system and skin (and I am sure I will be mentioning omega 3 fatty acids in future blog postings!).  Many of us do not eat these types of fish regularly (two portions per week is usually recommended) and hence a daily fish oil supplement (providing around 300mg of EPA and 200mg DHA) may be very useful for the prevention of hay fever and even to promote optimal health and wellbeing.  For vegetarians and vegans flaxseed oil (1000mg daily) can provide omega 3 fatty acids in the form of alpha linolenic acid which the body then bio-converts to EPA (the long chain form). 

One other natural remedy which can be helpful in the treatment of hay fever is the herb Butterbur (Petasites hybridus). This herb seems to exhibit anti-inflammatory activity and anti-allergic properties.   The British Medical Journal published a study(3) which compared Butterbur supplementation with the conventional antihistamine drug cetirizine (prescribed in the UK under the name Zirtek).  Both treatments were equally effective in reducing hay fever symptoms.  However, the drug cetirizine tended to cause side effects such as fatigue and drowsiness.  The authors of the study concluded that:  “The effects of butterbur are similar to those of cetirizine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.....Butterbur should be considered for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis when the sedative effects of antihistamines need to be avoided”.

As an interesting point antibiotics used in children in their first 2 years of life have been associated with a 2-3 fold increased risk of hay fever(4).  As well as destroying the bacteria that cause illness in the body antibiotics also kill the healthy bacteria that live in the digestive system.  As mentioned in a previous posting these friendly bacteria have been shown to positively affect the immune system, which is responsible for allergic and inflammatory responses in the body, so a prebiotic and probiotic supplement may be useful to anyone who has been recently exposed to antibiotics or as an immune boosting aid (see post dated 19/05/08 for more detail about pre- and probiotics for immune health).

And finally, a study last year (5) found that almost 50% of hay fever suffers seem to be highly sensitive not only to typical allergy triggers like grass, tree pollens, dust and animal hair but also to things like cold air, perfumes, cigarette smoke and household cleaning products.  So, if you find that you often suffer from symptoms like itchy eyes and stuffy or runny nose you may find it useful to take a product containing vitamin C and bioflavonoids (as discussed in Part I) all year around as a preventative, anti-allergic measure.

(1) Maes M et al.  2000.  In humans, serum polyunsaturated fatty acid levels predict the response of proinflammatory cytokines to psychologic stress.  Biol Psychiatry.  47(10):910-920.
(2) Nagel G et al.  2003.  The influence of the dietary intake of fatty acids and antioxidants on hay fever in adults.  Allergy.  58(12):1277-1284.
(3) Schapowal A.  2002.  Randomised controlled trial of butterbur and cetirizine for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis.  BMJ.  324:144-146
(4) Wickens K et al.  1999.  Antibiotic use in early childhood and the development of asthma, hay fever and eczema. Clin Exp Allergy.  29:766-771
(5)Shusterman D and Murphy MA.  2007.  Nasal hyperreactivity in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis: a potential risk factor for non-specific building-related illness.Indoor Air.  17:328-333

Written by Ani Kowal

Tuesday, May 27, 2008 8:14:27 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback